Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
Source file repositories/reference/linux-study-clean/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst
File Facts
- System
- Linux kernel
- Corpus path
Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst- Extension
.rst- Size
- 5741 bytes
- Lines
- 105
- Domain
- Support Tooling And Documentation
- Bucket
- Documentation
- Inferred role
- Support Tooling And Documentation: documentation
- Status
- atlas-only
Why This File Exists
Repository support layer: documentation, build tooling, samples, user-space helper tools, generated initramfs support, licenses, and validation utilities.
- Repository support layer: documentation, build tooling, samples, user-space helper tools, generated initramfs support, licenses, and validation utilities.
Dependency Surface
- No C-style include directives detected by the generator.
Detected Declarations
- No top-level syscall, struct, function, initcall, or export declaration detected by the generator.
Annotated Snippet
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
==========================
Frequently Asked Questions
==========================
How is this different from Autotest, kselftest, and so on?
==========================================================
KUnit is a unit testing framework. Autotest, kselftest (and some others) are
not.
A `unit test <https://martinfowler.com/bliki/UnitTest.html>`_ is supposed to
test a single unit of code in isolation and hence the name *unit test*. A unit
test should be the finest granularity of testing and should allow all possible
code paths to be tested in the code under test. This is only possible if the
code under test is small and does not have any external dependencies outside of
the test's control like hardware.
There are no testing frameworks currently available for the kernel that do not
require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a virtual machine. All
testing frameworks require tests to be written in userspace and run on the
kernel under test. This is true for Autotest, kselftest, and some others,
disqualifying any of them from being considered unit testing frameworks.
Does KUnit support running on architectures other than UML?
===========================================================
Yes, mostly.
For the most part, the KUnit core framework (what we use to write the tests)
can compile to any architecture. It compiles like just another part of the
kernel and runs when the kernel boots, or when built as a module, when the
module is loaded. However, there is infrastructure, like the KUnit Wrapper
(``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``) that might not support some architectures
(see :ref:`kunit-on-qemu`).
In short, yes, you can run KUnit on other architectures, but it might require
more work than using KUnit on UML.
For more information, see :ref:`kunit-on-non-uml`.
.. _kinds-of-tests:
What is the difference between a unit test and other kinds of tests?
====================================================================
Most existing tests for the Linux kernel would be categorized as an integration
test, or an end-to-end test.
- A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation. A unit
test should be the finest granularity of testing and, as such, allows all
possible code paths to be tested in the code under test. This is only possible
if the code under test is small and does not have any external dependencies
outside of the test's control like hardware.
- An integration test tests the interaction between a minimal set of components,
usually just two or three. For example, someone might write an integration
test to test the interaction between a driver and a piece of hardware, or to
test the interaction between the userspace libraries the kernel provides and
the kernel itself. However, one of these tests would probably not test the
entire kernel along with hardware interactions and interactions with the
userspace.
- An end-to-end test usually tests the entire system from the perspective of the
code under test. For example, someone might write an end-to-end test for the
kernel by installing a production configuration of the kernel on production
hardware with a production userspace and then trying to exercise some behavior
that depends on interactions between the hardware, the kernel, and userspace.
KUnit is not working, what should I do?
=======================================
Unfortunately, there are a number of things which can break, but here are some
Annotation
- Atlas domain: Support Tooling And Documentation / Documentation.
- Implementation status: atlas-only.
Implementation Notes
- This generated page is the file-by-file coverage layer; curated subsystem chapters should link here when they synthesize a multi-file control flow.
- Core OS pages should be promoted from atlas-only to deep-reviewed when they explain data structures, invariants, locking, lifecycle, and C implementation snippets.
- Driver-family pages are intentionally pattern-oriented unless they are part of the selected PCIe/NVMe representative device path.